Kennedy Investigation in Regards to Evidence

Date: Sep 27, 2020

Abstract

Crime scene evidence is fundamental to the solving of any crime.  Crime scene investigators often unravel the mystery behind most criminal activities. There has been a lot of theories that have surrounded the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Most of the ideas and questions have remained uncertified and answered because of the level of Crime scene evidence that was brought forth. Even with the improvement in technology, less has been done to respond to some of the most obvious questions about this assassination. Various conspiracy theories have been left unanswered. The issue under consideration is whether or not Oswald received help during the assassination. This paper is a discussion of the introduction of neutron activation analysis in the investigation of Kennedy’s assassination to ascertain whether the shooting was done by Harvey Oswald only or he had help during the assassination. The paper goes ahead to explain the vagueness of the evidence available that cannot answer this question with certainty. The paper concludes on the fact that little crime scene evidence, in this case, has resulted in ambiguity on whether Oswald assassinated the President by himself or was helped.

 

Issue

Criminology has continually changed over the years with the introduction of new technology and scientific innovations. A lot of crimes that were impossible to solve in the past can be easily solved today. Forensic investigations are one of the aspects of criminology that has changed the world of criminal investigations today. The crime scene investigators today are easily able to find significant evidence of crime solving then they were able to decades ago. This ability has led to there- opening up of some of the most popular crime investigations which have continued to attract interest till date despite the fact that they happened decades ago. The assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963 is one of the crimes whose dynamics have interested Americans and other people globally. When this crime occurred, most of the current methods of crime solving had not been introduced.  There are therefore several unanswered questions and new unproven rumors about this assassination. The evidence then was not analyzed as they could have been now. This paper is a discussion of the Kennedy’s continual investigation concerning the evidence from the crime scene.

Rule

Working in today’s technological environment, the most interesting aspect of crime investigation in the Kennedy’s investigation case is neutron activation analysis. Neutron activation analysis is an interesting scientific method of checking the coherence of different chemical components of different objects. This process often involves object bombarding using neutrons. Neutrons cause an object to be radioactive as they are captured by the atoms in the object under analysis. Once an object is radioactive, its atoms start to emit gamma rays. These rays can be easily analyzed to check the chemical components of the object.  This analysis was implemented to help answer the rumors that there was more than one man involved in the shooting during the assassination of John F. Kennedy, who has not yet been apprehended for his acts of crime. 

The fragments from the car that were recovered after the crime were then subjected to neutron activation analysis to prove or dispel these rumors.  In this case, the fragments and bullets found at the crime scene were subjected to analysis. In the analysis, the investigators were seeking for any difference in the bullet chemical compositions that would imply the use of different guns. This process revealed that there was little difference in the components of the bullets which experts interpreted to mean that the bullets came from one gun. Neutron activation analysis forensics is, therefore, one of the most advanced scientific and technological methods that help in crime scene investigation of evidence.

Analysis

Crime scene evidence is key in solving any crime. In the case of the evidence from the crime scene in Kennedy’s assassination, the autopsy photos were not properly taken. Proper autopsy photos would help answer a majority of questions about this crime. The FBI denied the specialist photographer who was to skillfully take the autopsy photos access for security purposes. The photos were then taken by an FBI photographer who was inexperienced and therefore produced photos that were quite deficient. The entrance and exit wounds are essential in the solving of any crime that involved bullets. The photographs taken by the FBI photographer did not focus on these wounds and therefore identifying them was a challenge which left a lot of loopholes in the investigation process. The photographer did not modify the scales to comprehensively reveal the size of the wounds which would have comprehensively helped in drawing viable conclusions about the crime. The photographs did not also entail the internal organs. From the scanty evidence obtained from these autopsy photographs, it is impossible to come up with viable conclusions on the crime. The little evidence allows a lot of conspiracy theories to keep developing and lingering in the minds of people.

It is hard to point out whether there was Harvey Oswald was alone, or he had help during the assassination.  There is no viable evidence to support or oppose this statement. The challenges fall under the fact that the crime scene evidence was insufficient and that Oswald himself was not properly interrogated. There are no notes from the conversation that Oswald has with officers Guy F. Rose and Richard S. Stovall, who were the first to interrogate him. His assassination occurred before his theory of what exactly happened was clearly established. Lack of clear evidence from the prime suspect is a reflection that no accurate conclusions could be made on whether Hervey was alone or there was someone else who either helped him or conducted the assassinations. In the little that Harvey discussed before his death, there was no definite proof that he was lying. 

The report given by the Warren Commission, which was charged with the responsibility of investigating this assassination, was a little mismatched. In their opinion, the gunman must have been on the sixth floor of a building along the road that was used by the president’s motorcade. This conclusion would have the killer behind the presidential motorcade which was untrue according to the 32 witnesses who acknowledged that the shots came from the front. The evidence, in this case, were not well analyzed, and this continues to cause doubts on the extent of conspiracy involved in John F. Kennedy’s assassination. It is therefore had to conclude only from the evidence of the neutron activation analysis that there was only one gun used, and it was only used by Harvey Oswald.

From the crime scene, the most important aspect would be the location of Hervey Oswald during the shooting and the number of shots made. This knowledge would help conclude whether he acted alone or not. The dynamics of which floor Oswald was in have never been clear. The rifle used in the assassination and the three bullet shells were found in the sixth flow. A majority of witnesses claim that they saw a gunman on the sixth floor. The description by the witnesses fitted Oswald while others did not. The chief witness Howard Brennan, who claimed to have seen Oswald on the sixth floor, could not identify him in a lineup. Carolyn Arnold, an employee who worked at the same place as Oswald claimed to have seen him either in the first or second floor of the building and around the same time when a majority of the witnesses saw a gunman on the sixth flow.

The empty bullet shells were found close to the window of the sixth floor which guaranteed that the assassin would have probably left fingerprints on the bookshelves, books, and boxes to shoot from that floor. Oswald’s palmprints were, however, found on two boxes on this floor. One was a palm print that was put on the box three days to the assassination, and the other was a fingerprint that was older. It is worth noting however that these palm and finger prints would have occurred when Oswald was doing his job which involved touching of boxes and book shelves.

Get to know about our research writing service. At EssayStore.net we work hard to provide high quality written papers online to our customers. Don't hesitate - order now!

Conclusion

In conclusion, the facts about the assassination of John Kennedy are rare. The evidence conflict and contrast making it difficult to diagnose and come up with definite conclusions. Whether Harvey Oswald shot on the president on his own or received help during the assassination continues to be a mystery. The evidence that can be traced to come up with factual conclusions is not available. Almost all parts of the crime scene's pieces of evidence are unclear. The poor photography further proved the incapability of drawing viable conclusions on the bullets that were shot at the president and the governor. The wounds are not well represented in the photos and hence no precise diagnosis. This case has therefore remained with a lot of unanswered questions due to the insufficient evidence that is available. Conspiracy theories continue to form over the dynamics of this murder that will never be entirely refuted.